Below is Chris Langan’s response to my criticism of his CTMU theory, I have posted his response in the interest of fairness. My criticism can be found here. The following post in no way represents the opinions of our blog. I invite the reader to read the entire transaction of events and judge for himself/herself:

How tiresome … another “criticism of the CTMU” that says absolutely nothing about the CTMU.

I was hoping for at least one of two pleasant surprises: that you (Tom Beasley) would manage to grow up a little before sounding off again, so to speak, or that you would at least try to critique my theory in something resembling an honest and meaningful way. Unfortunately, you’ve proven to be a complete disappointment on both counts.

When I offered you a chance to have me read and respond to your CTMU criticism, I was doing you a favor for which you are technically unqualified and of which you are plainly undeserving. Unfortunately for both you and your readers, you’ve wasted this golden opportunity by using it to demonstrate how many bad assumptions, snide innuendos, non sequiturs, and red herrings you can cram into one misbegotten web page without actually writing anything worth reading.

Let me cite some examples. Continue reading…