After reading Doyle Barnett’s Spiritual Growth is Not What You Think: How Seekers Mistake the Evolution of Their Philosophy for Spiritual Progress, I can only tell you one thing: spiritual growth was exactly what I thought it was. That may be because Barnett and I have a slightly differing view on spiritual growth, though.

His explanation is a tricky one to find in his book. He spends dozens of pages talking about “spirituality” and “Spirit” but declines (whether intentionally or not, is still up in the air) to tell us his definition until page 151 in the “An Important Distinction to Consider” section of Chapter 11: Defining Spiritual Achievement. According to Barnett “Spiritual growth is the expanding of one’s ability to love holistically.” What is holistic love, you may be asking. Well, wait 11 more pages to find out. On page 162, he defines “Real love”, “Personal love”, “Grand love” and “Holistic love”; the latter meaning “a comprehensive love… It is caring for one’s self, for others, for humanity, and the planet.”
Now that’s something I can get behind. I understand, I like it, but unfortunately it may be a let down for most people. I would be inclined to believe that the lay-religious-person would think spiritual growth is coming closer to God, but Barnett makes it painfully obvious through quotes, diatribes and anecdotes that to know God is an impossibility. Of course this is coming from a self-proclaimed atheist (according to the letter he sent me with the book).
Continue reading…