103: Free Will
By Christopher Thielen on December 17, 2013
Tom, Christopher Thielen, and Chris Lazare discuss whether free will is an illusion and what implications that may have for the criminal justice system and our organization of society.
Tom, Christopher Thielen, and Chris Lazare discuss whether free will is an illusion and what implications that may have for the criminal justice system and our organization of society.
Harris describes law and justice, even retributive justice, as still having a place if it is known empirically, statistically, to alter behavior.
But the question of civil disobedience is a good one: If we treat deviants as ill, would we accidentally wind up suppressing valid social change?
I’m not sure how worried to be about that though: the most readily available advice to derive from these ideas on free will would be to simply stop treating drug addicts with jail time and to take responsibility for the social factors that lead people to break into houses, cars, murder, etc. All of this sounds like a society maturing to me.
I’m surprised at how little discussion is here…am I missing something?
I’m fascinated with these ideas; I’ve been wading through am not really sure how to begin to talk about it but wanted to thank you for introducing me to this; just want you to know that although there is little feedback here, there are listeners like me who are super interested but it’s twisted my brain up so that I’m just still processing. Thanks for taking the time to do your show.
I like the helpful info you provide in your articles. I
will bookmark your blog and check again here frequently.
I’m quite sure I will learn plenty of new stuff right here!
Good luck for the next!
Do you have a spam issue on this blog; I also am a blogger,
and I was wondering your situation; we have created some nice
practices and we are looking to trade strategies with other folks, please shoot me an e-mail
if interested.
After I initially left a comment I appear to have clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and from now on every
time a comment is added I recieve four emails with the exact same comment.
There has to be a way you are able to remove me from that service?
Kudos!
My spouse and I stumbled over here different web page and thought I may as well check things out.
I like what I see so now i am following you. Look forward to looking into
your web page again.
Copyright © 2009–2014 Christopher Thielen & others. Some rights reserved.
The legal issue is a problem for determinists, as I see it, the exception seems to make the rule. If a person has an ailment that causes him/her to act violently or in some manner extra-legally isn’t the fact that it’s an anomaly reason to treat as such philosophically? And what of law itself, isn’t it’s purpose to proscribe behavior that’s contrary to social norms? It appears to me the determinist claims are normative claims and that acting outside the law is the equivalent of some kind of mental breakdown. How would determinists deal with civil disobedience or conscientious objection?